DiscoverLegal Issues In PolicingE77| A collision, an EDR extraction & privacy. Did a warrantless vehicle seizure permit a crash data download?
E77| A collision, an EDR extraction & privacy. Did a warrantless vehicle seizure permit a crash data download?

E77| A collision, an EDR extraction & privacy. Did a warrantless vehicle seizure permit a crash data download?

Update: 2024-08-19
Share

Description

Provide your feedback here. Send me a Text Message.

In this episode, Mike discusses the Ontario Court of Appeal decision R. v. Attard, 2024 ONCA 616 where police — investigating a serious motor vehicle collision — seized the accused’s car, removed its event data recorder (EDR) and extracted the data, all without judicial authorization or consent. Was this warrantless conduct lawful? Could the data be used in court at the accused’s trial on a charge of dangerous driving causing bodily harm? The trial judge didn’t think so. Listen to find out what the Ontario Court of Appeal had to say when it weighed in on the matter. 

Trial court Charter ruling
Trial court acquittal

R. v. Fedan, 2016 BCCA 26
R. v. Major, 2022 SKCA 80 

Thanks for listening! Feedback welcome at legalissuesinpolicing@gmail.com

Comments 
In Channel
loading
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

E77| A collision, an EDR extraction & privacy. Did a warrantless vehicle seizure permit a crash data download?

E77| A collision, an EDR extraction & privacy. Did a warrantless vehicle seizure permit a crash data download?